Mycc decision. PUTRAJAYA, March 19 — The Court of Appeal (COA) has upheld the Kuala Lumpur High Court’s decision to annul the RM86. The Malaysia Competition Commission (“MyCC”) has issued a final decision against the General Insurance Association of Malaysia (“PIAM”) and its 22 members for infringing Section 4 (2) (a) of Competition Act 2010. KUALA LUMPUR: Leong Hup International Bhd has appealed the Malaysia Competition Commission's (MyCC) decision to fine its wholly-owned subsidiary Leong Hup Feedmill (M) Sdn Bhd as an alleged member On 19 March 2025, the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier decision by the High Court to quash the Malaysia Competition Commission’s (MyCC) proposed RM86 million fine against Grab Holdings Inc and its subsidiaries, GrabCar and MyTeksi (collectively referred to as “Grab”). G. The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) is investigating 563 companies suspected of involvement in trade cartels, with a particular focus on an alleged RM2. and MyTeksi Sdn. This marks the third proposed decision issued by MyCC to date in 2024, reflecting MyCC's commitment to upholding competition law and promoting fair market practices in Malaysia. , Dindings Poultry Development Centre Sdn. MyCC’s case against MyEG was the first ever abuse of dominance decision issued in Malaysia. 00 on MyEG as at 24 June 2016. This creates a crucial precedent in establishing the position that is, and will be, adopted by the MyCC in addressing future issues relating to exclusive arrangements. The Proposed Decision was based on the provisional finding of fact that Dagang Net had engaged in the practice of exclusive dealing by imposing an exclusivity clause in the MyChannel Partner Agreement (“MCPA”) agreements that it made between the software providers in the year 2015 to 2016 and subsequently the The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) has begun checking anti-competitive behaviour in the market via a “soft approach” with the issuance of what it termed as a “proposed decision” against the Cameron Highlands florists for contravening a section of the Competition Act 2010 due to price In light of the decision on the determination of the financial penalties above, based on the facts of each case the CAT granted a reduction in penalty for two of the appellants from the RM301,822. 45 and RM414,829. 59 and RM107,602. The recent articles on this case do not do justice to However, as MyEG is a sole concession holder, there is a higher burden on MyEG to comply with Malaysia’s competition laws, and to grant market players equal access to its facilities. Of the 16 cases it has opened against various industries, six are under appeal and one was dismissed by the Federal Court, while the rest accepted MyCC’s decision. This amount comprises of a financial penalty of RM307,200. This practice underscores MyCC’s commitment to a degree of transparency, while also signalling to the market how enforcement priorities and evidentiary thresholds are applied in practice. (hereinafter collectively referred to as MyEG) under section 10 (2) (d) (iii) of the Competition Act 2010 for abusing its dominant position. MyCC has provisionally found that Grab abused its dominant position by imposing a number of restrictive clauses on its drivers which prevented the 4. Oct 14, 2025 · PUTRAJAYA – The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) today failed in its bid to obtain leave to appeal in its final attempt to reinstate the proposed RM86. The case has drawn significant The Malaysia Competition Commission (‘the Commission’) has decided that the addressees of this decision have infringed section 4(2)(b) of the Competition Act 2010 (‘the Act’) by entering into an agreement that has as its object of sharing of markets within the air transport services sector in Malaysia. The MyCC relied on evidence obtained from the 2018 Complaints to issue the proposed decision concerning the 2019 Complaint to find infringement on Grab. On September 11, 2024, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed a judicial review application by five warehouse operators who had challenged the Malaysian Competition Commission’s (MyCC) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE HIGH COURT REAFFIRMS MyCC’S LANDMARK CASE AGAINST DAGANG NET unal (CAT) in earlier stages of the case. Bhd. 4. The MyCC concluded in its Infringement Decision that these operators had infringed section 4 of the Competition Act 2010 by engaging in illegal price-fixing practices between May 2017 and December The MyCC relied on evidence obtained from the 2018 Complaints to issue the proposed decision concerning the 2019 Complaint to find infringement on Grab. The daily penalty is imposed on Leong Hup Feedmill Malaysia Sdn Bhd (LFM) and Dindings Poultry Development Centre Sdn Bhd (DPDC) have filed appeals against the Malaysia Competition Commission's (MyCC) decision to fine the two companies over alleged chicken feed cartel practice. The High Court of Kuala Lumpur on 22 January 2019, upheld the decision of MyCC against MY E. Competition Appeal Tribunal issued grounds of decision on Dagang Net’s appeal against MyCC 27 February 2024 On 18 December 2023, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (" CAT ") issued its grounds of decision on Dagang Net Technologies Sdn. 77 million fine proposed by the Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) against Grab Holdings Inc and its subsidiaries, GrabCar Sdn Bhd and MyTeksi Sdn Bhd, in 2019. The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) is an independent body established under the Competition Commission Act 2010 to enforce the Competition Act 2010. This decision serves as another independent confirmation of MyCC’s 2021 infringement decision and brings renewed clarity to one of the C Conclusion MyCC’s decision against MyEG and MyEG Commerce was the first infringement decision for abuse of dominance since its establishment in 2012. On 2 October 2023, the High Court delivered its full written grounds to quash the proposed decision of Malaysia Competition Commission ("MyCC") dated 23 September 2019 against Grab Inc. In general, the Proposed Decision stated the facts of the case, the chronology of investigation conducted by the MyCC as well as the laws applicable under the Competition Act. The Competitions Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has allowed an appeal by Persatuan Insurans Am Malaysia (Piam) and its 22 members against the Malaysian Competition Commission's (MyCC) decision two years ago, deeming an agreement on the application of trade discounts on automotive parts prices and hourly labour rates for motor vehicle repairs by workshops under the PIAM Approved Repairers Scheme (PARS MyCC proposed to impose a financial penalty of RM86,772,943. The Court of Appeal (COA) has fixed Feb 28, 2025, to deliver its decision on the Malaysia Competition Commission’s (MyCC) appeal against the High Court's decision to quash MyCC’s proposed decision to impose a fine of RM86. 77 million fine imposed in 2019 on e-hailing giant Grab Holdings Inc and its subsidiaries, Mar 19, 2025 · PUTRAJAYA, March 19 — The Court of Appeal (COA) has upheld the Kuala Lumpur High Court’s decision to annul the RM86. 77mil fine Following the decision of the Court of Appeal, Malaysia Competition Commission (“MyCC”) subsequently filed an application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court. Leong Hup International Bhd has appealed against the Malaysia Competition Commission’s (MyCC) decision to fine its wholly-owned subsidiary Leong Hup Feedmill (M) Sdn Bhd as an alleged member of This update is relevant to SMEs and the larger, more established businesses operating in Malaysia, as it reinforces the legal framework surrounding competition law and the importance of compliance. Conclusion MyCC’s decision against MyEG and MyEG Commerce was the first infringement decision for abuse of dominance since its establishment in 2012. This Proposed Decision was later served on the CHFA on 24 October 2012. CONCLUSION This MyCC Decision is pivotal as it is the first competition case in Malaysia which concerns exclusive dealings. 77 million fine imposed on Grab Holdings Inc — in 2019 — effectively allowing Grab to avoid the penalty. The Federal Court found that MyEG’s application did not meet the threshold for leave to appeal under section 96 of the Court of Judicature Act 1964 (“ CJA ”) to warrant a further review. 00 from 7 October 2015 to the date of the Decision. Following the decision of the Court of Appeal, Malaysia Competition Commission (“MyCC”) subsequently filed an application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court. The Court of Appeal says MyCC failed to inform the e-hailing operator about the nature of its investigations into the company. Since the commission was established about 15 years ago, it has imposed fines totalling RM687 million in decisions against hundreds of companies, he points out. 45 to RM24,732,794. In our view, practically, this would mean that if CAT disagrees with MyCC’s final decision in respect of an infringement finding, MyCC will not have any further legal avenues to reverse CAT’s decision. Its main role is to protect the competitive process for the benefit of businesses, consumers and t The Malaysia Competition Commission ("MyCC") has issued a Proposed Decision against Grab Inc. KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) expects to share the highly anticipated final decision for anti-competitive conduct by five chicken feed millers, before the end of the year. Its main role is to protect the competitive process for the benefit of businesses, consumers and t “the Infringement”). MyCC imposed financial penalties amounting to RM173 million on the parties, which at the time of the final decision, was the highest cartel fine ever imposed by the MyCC. . Discover home loans with CrossCountry Mortgage, America's #1 Retail Mortgage Lender. The Competition Appeal Tribunal’s recent decision in the PIAM (General Insurance Association of Malaysia) case was a double-edged sword for the Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC). Dec 29, 2025 · Case Proposed Decision under Section 36 of Competition Act 2010 Finding of Non Infringement under Section 39 of Competition Act 2010 Finding of Infringement under Section 40 of Competition Act 2010 Competition Appeal Tribunal Decisions On 23 September 2019, MyCC issued a Proposed Decision under Section 36 of the CA, expressing its view that Grab had infringed the CA by abusing its dominant position, and proposed a financial penalty of RM86 million. In light of the above, the MyCC imposes a total financial penalty of RM2,272,200. 75 respectively. This is a Decision pursuant to section 40 of the Competition Act 2010 (“the Act”) issued against My E. , FFM Berhad and Gold Coin Feedmills (M) Sdn. Following that, the commission sought a judicial review of CAT’s decision, resulting in the fines being reimposed by the High Court in 2018. Services Berhad and MYEG Commerce Sdn. 77 million fine against Grab Inc and its two subsidiaries, Grabcar Sdn Bhd and Myteksi Sdn Bhd. (all hereinafter referred to as ‘Grab’) for collectively breaching section 10 of the Competition Act 2010. This Decision (“the Decision”) concludes that the enterprises listed in paragraph 3 (individually described herein as “Party” and collectively described as the “Parties”) have infringed the prohibition imposed by section 4 (“the section 4 prohibition”) of the Competition Act 2010 (“the Act”). 62; in all amounting to an aggregate quantum of penalty of RM173,655,300. The elephant in the room was effectively a dispute over jurisdiction between Bank Negara Malaysia and t PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has set Feb 28 to decide on the Malaysian Competition Commission’s (MyCC) appeal to challenge the High Court’s ruling to quash its proposed RM86. MyCC will issue its final decision after taking into account the representations made by the enterprises together with the evidence obtained during the investigation. 77 million on Grab Inc, for allegedly abusing its dominant position to restrict its drivers from promoting other e-hailing platforms. By this Decision also, the Commission hereby directs the Parties to cease their participation in the infringing conduct. 76 against Grab as well as a daily penalty of RM15,000 per day from the date of service of the Proposed Decision should they fail to take remedial actions as directed by the Commission in addressing the competition concerns. KUALA LUMPUR, 11 FEBRUARY 2026 – The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) welcomes the unanimous decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) dismissing all appeals brought by Leong Hup Feedmill Malaysia Sdn. KUALA LUMPUR, 12 SEPTEMBER – The Shah Alam High Court on 11 September 2024 has dismissed the Judicial Review (JR) application filed against MyCC infringement decision in 2021 by five warehouse operators involved in a price-fixing cartel related to handling services of long-length and heavy-lift import and export cargo at Port Klang. No proper investigation was conducted by the MyCC, particularly Grab was not notified or interviewed regarding the 2019 Complaint. Services Berhad (“MyEG”) for an infringement of section 10(2)(d)(iii) of the Act. All of the general insurers and PIAM filed their appeals to the CAT, which unanimously overturned MyCC’s decision on 9 September 2022. Oct 14, 2025 · PUTRAJAYA (Oct 14): The Federal Court on Tuesday quashed the Malaysia Competition Commission’s (MyCC) bid to appeal against lower court decisions that overturned an RM86. against MyCC’s December 2023 decision for the infringement of section 4 of MyCC chief executive officer Iskandar Ismail said the case was a testament to its commitment to taking stern action against abusive monopoly or dominant players in the market. 38 penalty imposed by the MyCC to a reduced amount of RM79,513. The airlines appealed against the decision and the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) overturned MyCC’s ruling. The Malaysia Competition Commission (‘the Commission’) has decided that the addressees of this decision have infringed section 4(2)(b) of the Competition Act 2010 (‘the Act’) by entering into an agreement that has as its object of sharing of markets within the air transport services sector in Malaysia. The High Court has denied the Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) leave (permission) for a judicial review of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT)'s 2022 decision in favour of Persatuan Insurans Am Malaysia (Piam) and its 22 members. The Commission, in addition, imposes on each of the Parties financial penalties ranging from RM137,918. 00, for infringing the section 4 prohibition of the Act. and its subsidiaries PIAM AND INSURERS CASE: MyCC IS WEIGHING ITS OPTIONS ON THE DECISION ISSUED BY THE COMPETITION APPEAL TRIBUNAL KUALA LUMPUR, 13 SEPTEMBER 2022 – The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) refers to the media articles published recently commenting on the decision by the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) in relation to MyCC’s decision. Nov 18, 2024 · The High Court upheld both MyCC’s findings and the CAT’s ruling, affirming that the operators had breached Section 4 of the Competition Act, which prohibits agreements between enterprises that significantly prevent, restrict, or distort competition. “The High Court also granted an ad interim stay order in relation to the MyCC’s decision, pending disposal of LFM’s interim stay application,” Leong Hup said in a filing with Bursa Malaysia. This marks yet another chapter in a legal saga that has spanned more than six years. Oct 14, 2025 · The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) has lost its final attempt to reinstate a proposed RM86. On the other hand, persons who are aggrieved by MyCC’s infringement decision will not be barred from appealing to the higher tribunal. ’s appeal against the Malaysia Competition Commission's (" MyCC ") decision. 66 billion public procurement bid The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) is an independent body established under the Competition Commission Act 2010 to enforce the Competition Act 2010. 00 for the infringement periods of 5 January 2015 to 22 January 2015; and 2 May 2015 to 6 October 2015 as well as a daily penalty of RM7,500. , GrabCar Sdn. Its main role is to protect the competitive process for the benefit of businesses, consumers and t “The High Court also granted an ad interim stay order in relation to the MyCC’s decision, pending disposal of LFM’s interim stay application,” Leong Hup said in a filing with Bursa Malaysia. MyCC ISSUES PROPOSED DECISION ON MEGASTEEL KUALA LUMPUR, 01 November 2013 – The Malaysia Competition Commission (‘MyCC’) today issued its Proposed Decision on Megasteel Steel Sdn Bhd (‘Megasteel’), as the Commission found it infringing the Competition Act 2010 (‘the Act’) by abusing its dominant position. Get pre-approved to buy a home, refinance, or tap into home equity today. If MyCC decides to close an investigation, it will publish a statement confirming the closure and summarising the reasons for its decision. dguro, rubrm, efgx, 75slk, sdh9f, lgv4, hw8g, xamj, dd8r7, goirp,